Log In | Subscribe | |

cash

Just how much money can a group of tourists hide in their socks and knickers, plus a variety of other methods of concealment? It's far more than you might think.

Continuing our analysis of AFP v Ganesh Kalimuthu & Anor

For part one see here

The case is said to be on its own facts but the Court was not invited to consider all the relevant facts. It is therefore a narrow judgment. It is a precedent but it is not a comprehensive precedent and creates an open door for international transfers of large amounts of money with impunity.

 


 

Click the Ad: the link opens in a new page